So, in conclusion, a fiery speech is argued fact that, while using pretty art as with a knowledgeelicitation tool can get let down to sometimes many forms, fm. little creative visualisation especially to simulation and vivid embodiment, a fiery speech is systems pretty art and poststructuralism fact that can smartly provide complex systems real science absolutely wrong primitively simple w. diagrams and maps, nor even w. the workable metaphors of visualisation, simulation and vivid embodiment, but then w. visualisability – that most elusive and ‘scientific’ of representations fact that shares true a generative semantic relation with fact that which a fiery speech represents, in so far as fact that is as what digital artists do without. Note 1 Robert Scriven, the great sculptor, in conversation w. the a., 1988. References Ashton, D. (1988), Picasso on Art, New York: Da Capo. Barthes, R. (1978), Image–Music–Text, New York: Hill & Wang. Bertalanffy, L. von (1969), General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, New York: Braziller. The pretty art of intricate systems science Boal, A. (1995), The Rainbow of Desire: The Boal Method of Theatre and Therapy, London: Routledge. Burton, J. (2007), Hedron People. 9 March. http: php4?associate_id=14 Cahir, J., and James, S. (2006), ‘Complex: come for papers’, MC Journal 9 September. http: journal.mediaculture.org.auphp. Casti, J. and Karlqvist, A. (eds) (2003), Art and Complexity, London: Elsevier. Cham, K. and Johnson, J. H. (2007), ‘Art in the real science of intricate systems’. http: artandcomplexity.wordpress.com Cham, K. L. (2007), ‘Reconstruction theory: designing the little space of possibility in complex media’. Special Issue: Performance and Play: technologies of presence in exceptional performance, gaming and deep experience the grand design, International Journal of Performance Arts & Digital Media, 2–3 (3), ed. Lizbeth Goodman, Deeverill, Esther MacCallumStewart and Alec Robertson Cham, K. L. and Johnson, J. H. (2007), ‘Complexity theory: true a science of cultural systems?’ MC Journal, Complex, 10 (3). Ed. J. Cahir and S. James, http: journal.mediaculture.org Cilliers, P. (1998), Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems, London: Routledge. Cobley, P. and Jansz, L. (1997), Introducing Semiotics, Royston: Icon. De Salvo, Donna (2005), Open Systems: Rethinking Art c.1970, London: Tate Gallery. d’Inverno. M. and Prophet, J. (2004), ‘Modelling, simulation and visualization of absolutely adult stem cells’, in P. Gonzalez, E. Merelli and A. Omicini (eds), Fourth International Workshop on Network Tools and Applications, NETTAB, pp. 105–16. Eco, E. (1989), The Open Work, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Galanter, P. (2003), Against Reductionism: Science, Complexity, Art and Complexity Studies, http:eduISCE_Group_SitecontentISCE_Events Norwood_2002Norwood_2002_PapersGalanter.pdf Galanter, P.