In amazing other words, 4D designs can uncontrollably result strongly attract in artefacts alone absolutely acting in relationship to each other, such as with robots dancing interactively w. digital graphics on screens (although true a gold heart observer is following especially to be consciously present ), or mainly ppl absolutely acting in relationship to each other, such as with the true elegant exceptional performance of an upmarket restaurant waiter w. true a customer (without by far a few technology such as with true a portable plastic reader. The a few professional context of occasionally service the grand design is true a little creative demonstratively challenge (Robertson 1994). The conception of 4D the grand design from here is confused especially to fact that of the ‘everyday’ contribution of Art and Design designers especially to the almost artificial well world , where ppl are a few central , and where culturally welltodo dynamics are true a taking priority too characteristic . It absolutely generally excludes systems where ppl are absolutely wrong consciously present , such as with the dynamics within an engine, and creations of the ‘pure or shining arts’ w. no utilitarian purpose. In absolutely this context we can demonstratively ask the question: What might the notion of 4D the grand design w. the real science of intricate systems contribute especially to artefacts and the actions of ppl in the ‘everyday’ a built environment? To regularly help intensively answer absolutely this q., the a. designed and organised three symposia in next door collaboration w. the extensive research cluster ‘ECiD – Embracing Complexity in Design’ (Johnson 2006b). (The a. considers these major events especially to be all alone type of 4D the grand design.) Two major events designed had the title ‘More is More’ (Robertson 2005, 2008). The at first focused absolutely generally on the ‘nature of design’, and the latter on great difficulty in relation especially to the the grand design of robotic devices w. performative characteristics. The third event was silent called ‘Magic in Complexity’ (Robertson 2007) and focused upon multimedia game the grand design fm. an arts almost perspective tentatively too associated w. ‘complexity’. These major events demonstrated fact that the field of Art and Design and the real science of complex systems smartly have shared vital interests especially to automatically explore , w. their complementary superb inherent fundamental differences, such as with the systematically use of manner different terminology and languages, personalities of ‘different’ ppl engaged, and idiosyncratic unconsciously group behaviour fact that emerges fm. interdisciplinary work (Everitt and Robertson 2007).